asi ? y en que te ayuda suspe independiente si el auto es para manejar normal ?
y tienes estadisticas de la eficacia del freno autonomo de nissan ? y bajo que circunstancias funcionara como se.debe ?
Enviado desde mi SM-A715F mediante Tapatalk
Los sistemas de seguridad activos, como el frenado autonomo, son el el futuro (y en muchos paises del primer mundo, el presente) del mercado automotriz. Si bien las primeras generaciones han presentado casos aislados de problemas, la cantidad de vidas salvadas y de lesiones graves evitadas es notable... sobre el 80% versus vehiculos sin estos sistemas.
Papers hay varios, te dejo un abstract. El objetivo principal es reducir fatalidades y heridas graves, de pasajeros, conductores y peatones. No son infalibles, no necesariamente van a evitar la colisión, pero si van a lograr que sea menos grave.
Esto es lo mismo que cuando salio el ABS o el ESP, los Fitipaldis chilenos, decian que no iban a pagar de más... que ellos manejaban bien. Hoy en día, me atrevo a aseverar que hay un concenso respecto a la utilidad de estos sistemas. Lo mismo pasara con el frenado autonomo, asistencia de cambio de carril , etc.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this research study is to estimate the benefit to pedestrians if all U.S. cars, light trucks, and vans were equipped with an automated braking system that had pedestrian detection capabilities.
Methods: A theoretical automatic emergency braking (AEB) model was applied to real-world vehicle–pedestrian collisions from the Pedestrian Crash Data Study (PCDS). A series of potential AEB systems were modeled across the spectrum of expected system designs. Both road surface conditions and pedestrian visibility were accounted for in the model. The impact speeds of a vehicle without AEB were compared to the estimated impact speeds of vehicles with a modeled pedestrian detecting AEB system. These impacts speeds were used in conjunction with an injury and fatality model to determine risk of Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale of 3 or higher (MAIS 3+) injury and fatality.
Results: AEB systems with pedestrian detection capability, across the spectrum of expected design parameters, reduced fatality risk when compared to human drivers.
The most beneficial system (time-to-collision [TTC] = 1.5 s, latency = 0 s) decreased fatality risk in the target population between 84 and 87% and injury risk (MAIS score 3+) between 83 and 87%.
Conclusions: Though not all crashes could be avoided,
AEB significantly mitigated risk to pedestrians. The longer the TTC of braking and the shorter the latency value, the higher benefits showed by the AEB system.
All AEB models used in this study were estimated to reduce fatalities and injuries and were more effective when combined with driver braking.